It just struck me... 
I've agreed with Evie that there is no real free will because we do what we are programmed to do. Our influences/ instincts determine our actions and there's really no possible decision we could possibly make against these influences.
It strikes me now... that 'no free will' actually means the enforcement of a choice potentially against what our influenced choice would have been. (It could be the same but still, not our choice).
Does that sound plausible?

I've agreed with Evie that there is no real free will because we do what we are programmed to do. Our influences/ instincts determine our actions and there's really no possible decision we could possibly make against these influences.
It strikes me now... that 'no free will' actually means the enforcement of a choice potentially against what our influenced choice would have been. (It could be the same but still, not our choice).
Does that sound plausible?