Avoiding questions

[Vera]

I do that for your benfit. Otherwise The Douche bags or bag-ettes on this web site will get me for being 'unchristian like.' I perfer not to throw gas on a fire.

By your logic anything a religious person disagrees with can be seen as blasphemous and thus any reasonable discussion is automatically precluded (as if reason and religion weren't mutually exclusive already).

You start out by saying I did not provide my 'logic' as I differed to Minnie, and now you are saying by my logic, and then proceed to tell me what 'my logic' is. How is it you can tell me my logic when appearently I did not offer it? Or did I? Can you show me where I provided this logic that allowed you to build your last arguement?

First of all, don't do me any favours like being "polite" on my behalf. (maybe just one though - learn to spell and/or spellcheck)

Second, maybe the hordes of devoute (sic) atheists that you've debated over the years have reached the point where they couldn't take your bull anymore and all the fucks you've had to endure were aimed at you.
Actually, you know what, at least one of these arguements (sic) must have been on the Internet. Could you send me link to a devoute (sic) atheist saying stuff like "Fuck god and the fucking holy ghost. That's why I don't believe in them. Not because I have logical arguments on my side, but because fuck god."

Thirdly, you did provide an example (a retarded one, but still). The one with the abominable F-word, which obviously gets you all worked up. So by that logic (that you consider this particular word to be blasphemous (without explaining why)), any religionist may claim that he or she finds a certain word, expression, even belief to be blasphemous and thus refuse to discuss any further (and waste his or her pearls on us... for which we would actually be eternally grateful - if all religionists could keep their bull to themselves.... yet, they can't seem to be able to do it... why is this, I wonder )