(December 3, 2012 at 11:47 am)Rayaan Wrote: Yeah, he tends to be insisting that his definition is universal and that everyone should follow that (which falls in line with Kant's philosophy).
Then again, it would be unwise of me criticize that since I'm a religious person myself.
I don't want to be hypocritical here.
Precisely, so to enforce one system of logic from one viewpoint would bias the interaction. As such we have to accept a level of incoherence, if we are to meet equally, and are reliant on good staff to administer the problems of that incoherence. And I think it is being done well.
Have I sucked up to the staff enough now?
