Avoiding questions

[Waratah]

Fuck me, why not say this in the first place, instead of fucking wasting everyone's time.

You didn't ask that the first time.

You're correct I did not ask that exact question first. I did not ask you what bibles you owned either but hey that is the response given(finally started to answer some questions like a normal human being, fucking amazing ). The Original question I asked was avoided anyway with a bullshit answer.

You called it a bible first, "blue letter bible"

Because that is what it is called!
http://www.blueletterbible.org/index.cfm
It says it there right on the home page!

A title does not make it a bible. I was pointing out that you called it a bible first then said concordance.

Is there a strongest one?

Their is if you are looking from a specific denominational perspective. If I want the strongest R/C version I would look to the vulgate of the LXX.

If you could only have one holy bible which one would you pick and why?

What does "pearls before swine excersize" mean?

Christ tells us not to throw our pearls of wisdom before swine. If you have no intrest in anything you are asking you can easily be judged a swine, or someone just looking for a way to trample what if offered into the mud.

Don't worry then, you have to have wisdom first. The only pearls I could imagine you could spurt is from your

Blue is not a bible. So for all verses it would be the NKJV for Darkstar

http://www.blueletterbible.org/index.cfm again tell that to the people who named and published the Blue letter Bible!

Can you buy a hard copy of the Blue letter Bible?

As you and I agree blue letter is not a bible. So which greek version is used for Minimalist?

You beg the question here.

Can you please explain what you mean by this "I have to give the greek." I took it as meaning a greek translation. This is why I asked for which version which you have not given. You're not trying to avoid again, are you? hock:

It is the ocean. I assume it was not there due to the words "completely empty"

Completely empty of what? See this is where we would default to the Blue letter BIBLE:
The Hebrew word that is translated into the term 'completely empty" is:בהו bohuw
Which means with out life, or completely empty of any type of life.
This is underscored by how this same word is used in Isa 34:11. Now as water is not alive we know the Hebrew word is further supported by this passage, and when we put everything in it's proper context

Please show me where בהו bohuw means "with out life". As far as I am aware it means empty, void, nothing. Nice try but the use of the word empty(בהו bohuw) in Isa 34:11 is used in a different context. Since you have not proven the "without life" comment your next sentence is irrelevant, "Now as water is not alive we know the Hebrew word is further supported by this passage, and when we put everything in it's proper context", and it does not make any sense.

Gen 1:1 God created the Heavens and the EARTH, we know it to mean God created All of the Heavens and a Completed Earth (Rocks Minierals and Water minus dry land and life) as per verse 3 and 4.

Who's "we"? Can you substantiate this claim "we know it to mean God created All of the Heavens and a Completed Earth (Rocks Minierals and Water minus dry land and life) as per verse 3 and 4.

Here is the question again

Question: How was it possible for darkness to cover the ocean when the ocean was not there?

Again how do you know it is not there?

Because of the meaning of בהו bohuw

With a proper exegesis of scripture we know Water to be present at the point of Gen 1:2.

No we don't. It is quite clear that there is no ocean due to the meaning of בהו bohuw

Is it by simple faith that you believe water to be not there?

Oh you poor thing it has nothing to do with faith on my part

If not then please explain what evidence you have to prove how you know their was no water present at the time of Gen 2 or Gen 3.

What is Gen 2 and Gen 3?

And don't forget the ones you avoided

How could god spirit move over water that was not there? The very first 2 lines of the bible and there are errors. How is it that your supposed god stuffed up the first 2 lines? If god is perfect, why are the first 2 lines wrong?[quote]

quid pro quoe Clairese, you answer me completly and i will answer you.

Answer what? I have not avoided your questions, you have avoided myn.

Thanks for the NOT providing link. Your problem is you used a capital for the word One. Just admit you were being a plus your example is not the same as what you used it for.

Per your request: "You were being a Jerk off."

Your comprehension skills are lacking. Just admit you were being a


Also could you please answer this question that you avoided once again.

Why are you moving the the goal posts again with your inclusion now of "biblically" for a question?