Fritzl, you haven't looked at the paper, so you don't know whether your criticisms are valid.
Your first criticisms were fraud. You claimed Ansa was a Roman Catholic organ, which was fraud.
Undoubtedly, since you haven't read the paper itself, your criticisms are currently fraud.
Any disagreement? Can you say that it's valid to criticize something without reading it? No?
Okay, discussion over. I don't want to talk to racists and I don't want to talk to frauds.
Your first criticisms were fraud. You claimed Ansa was a Roman Catholic organ, which was fraud.
Undoubtedly, since you haven't read the paper itself, your criticisms are currently fraud.
Any disagreement? Can you say that it's valid to criticize something without reading it? No?
Okay, discussion over. I don't want to talk to racists and I don't want to talk to frauds.


