RE: Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism?
December 5, 2012 at 7:12 am
(December 5, 2012 at 1:17 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Simple question.
This will weed out the realists and the rationalists from the rest.
What is the alternative to atheism?
Must I assume that religions already exist and then proceed to reject them (based in science and reason) in order to become an atheist?
Can't I be an atheist just by not being taught about religion at an early age?
Considering that I'm an atheist from birth, are you asking that I would very likely change my mind if this position wouldn't be supported by science and reason? Are you claiming that the alternative (religiousness) would be supported by something?