RE: Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism?
December 6, 2012 at 8:56 pm
(December 6, 2012 at 6:26 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Both of Dawkins ideas are bullshit.
They all boil down to "who designed the designer".
Which leads to an infinite regress and thus fails.
(December 6, 2012 at 6:26 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: You need to graduate from Dawkins are read smarter atheists. Nobody takes him seriously in universities anymore.And I should just take your word for it why?
(December 6, 2012 at 6:26 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: BTW, invisible unicorns who are also omnipotent and can create the universe? So you're a theist now?
Nope. Don't actually believe it. Also didn't say they were omnipotent or could create the universe, just that they are undetectable and they make it rain. It is their magic that lets water evaporate. Prove otherwise. Or is this one of those 'so unlikely we shouldn't even consider it' things? (yeah, it is, even though a flying invisible magical unicorn is less extraordinary than a god)
