Assange: Refugee or Fugitive?

[Something completely different]

The sexual offence you're talking about, to be clear, is two adults having consensual sex without a condom, correct?

No we are talking about him having sex with a woman - refusing to use a condom.

To then later have sex with another woman - not using a condom.

Which in swedish law - is seen as a sexual offence.

Sounds weird - but it is the law.

A narcecist, creepy fucktard like Assange is no exception. As far as I know Daniel, every police operation nessecery during a public protest involving 2000 people costs the taxpayer 600 000 Euros in Germany, the average murder case in the US costs the taxpayer between 600 000 and 1 500 000 dollars. Sooooo the money isn`t that much of a question if you ask me. Sure it sounds outrageous to some to think that 2 000 000 pounds sterling should be spent on survailing one embessy, but on the other hand - you will almoust certainly find cases in which the taxpayer has to spend more money to ensure a functioning juristiction.

Legally Germans, speaking legally, he is a refugee. The UK has signed the conventions relating to the protections afforded to refugees. Arresting a refugee is a scandalous offence. Assange can petition the UN High Commissioner for Refugees to force the UK to let him leave.

No. He is a refugee from your point of view.

A person fleeing from a warzone is a refugee.

A person fleeing from unlawfull persecution due to being a religious, ethnical, political or religious minority is a refugee - except when seen from the side of the prosecuter.

In order for him to be a refugee he would have to face unlawfull consequences and persecution when extradited. Which he doesnt.

Therefor the UN comissioner wont do jackshit.

Because BREAKING NEWS: Sweden is not some middle eastern dictatorship ruled by a cealot who pulls laws out of his ass.

According to who Germans? You?

No, because laws are here to be evaluated if they are effective and just or not.

So far, Assange has only used his impending extradition to theatricaly show himself as a victim of some crazed conspiracy, to create a image of a martyr.

First there's the USA's espionage investigation against WikiLeaks which they've attempted to conduct in "secret", but we all know about. In June Bob Carr told the public that he has absolutely no information that would suggest that Assange is being pursued for extradition by the USA. Then in August a freedom of information request generated the proof that the investigation into possible criminal conduct by the USA has been ongoing for more than a year, and that Australian diplomats had specifically asked the USA for advance warning of moves to extradite Assange (yes, even though he was and still is in the UK).

How does this disclaim what I stated before????

It doesn`t change how he poses arround with Nasralah and several other undemocratic figures and runs his wikileaks organisation like a tyrant running a cult.

Only because the US want him, that doesn`t make him abetter person.
What kind of a twisted logic is that?

Really? So what did the public not have a right to know?

The medical files of several heads of state!!!!!

An journalists from the Guardian, Le Monde and der Spiegel had to threaten Assange with violence not to publish the names of agents in abroad missions - so there wouldnt be the risk of them getting killed.