RE: Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study
December 9, 2012 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2012 at 3:41 pm by Al-Fatihah.)
(December 9, 2012 at 3:35 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: I'm afraid it doesn't work like that. You are making the claim that he existed.
So show us the evidence.
If you can't then it is as much hear say as Zeus, Jesus, Abraham or Moses.
all characters with doubtful historicity.
Response: I'm afraid it does, for you are making the claim that Muhammad is a fictional character, with absolutely no evidence, thus proving nothing.
(December 9, 2012 at 2:45 pm)Kayenneh Wrote: Why, oh why is always when a thread like this is made and someone claims to have made a study, that they never have a peer reviewed paper to show? If reading fiction was all it took to be a scholar, I would have been one for 20 years!
Response: the better qustion is why a thread like this is always filled with the same hypocritical responses like yours, in which something is climed as fiction with no evidence for it.
