Must all be proven?

[downbeatplumb]

Proving God exists is logically impossible.

So I take it you don't believe in the validity of the TAG argument? Or if you do (which I thought you did for some reason...), how can you argue that proving God exists is logically impossible when TAG tries to do that.

You missed my subsequent get out clause: "(To qualify, God can just not be proven scientifically)"

(Yes I realised that I'd boobed there )

So if there WAS some proof of gods existance you'd discount it, because it can't be proved by science yeah.

Bet it wouldn't play out like that eh Frodo