RE: FallentoReason 2.0
December 16, 2012 at 1:10 am
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2012 at 1:13 am by FallentoReason.)
C'mon Mr. Electrical engineer! Surely you are vaguely familiar with programming?
[ quote="person" ]
*person's post*
[ /quote ]
Remove the spaces between the square brackets and the stuff inside and there you have the format for quoting.
The agnostic nature of this topic means that what is "potentially true" could be the actual truth. How can it be proved 100% and thus go from "could exist" to "does exist"? Well, I'm agnostic, so I think it can't be done.
[ quote="person" ]
*person's post*
[ /quote ]
Remove the spaces between the square brackets and the stuff inside and there you have the format for quoting.
(December 15, 2012 at 11:07 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Potential won't help much. It's actuality you're shooting for, when you begin to imagine that things are so elegant that god simply must have done it (except those things you think he didn't do, of course...I assume they're less elegant- or some such). You don't seem to be after the god that -could exist-...the god that -could have done this-, but the god who does exist, who did do this.
The agnostic nature of this topic means that what is "potentially true" could be the actual truth. How can it be proved 100% and thus go from "could exist" to "does exist"? Well, I'm agnostic, so I think it can't be done.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
