RE: Alleged Contradictions - Seeing God's Face
November 9, 2008 at 10:24 am
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2008 at 10:27 am by Kyuuketsuki.)
(November 7, 2008 at 2:42 pm)Daystar Wrote: I think that it would be best for the two of you to consider the Bible as complete fiction and go from there.
Although not history the bible is a useful historic source but the essential claims made within it need to be critically & objectively examined (something you're not capable of based on your posts to date) and it's essential claims (the miraculous events, prophecies, claims to divinity etc./) taken with a pinch of salt until such time as evidence is presented that verifies those claims.
(November 7, 2008 at 2:42 pm)Daystar Wrote: Don't consider the evidence or credibility of it as important in a consideration of what you more comfortably think of as complete fiction. I'm not here to convince or convert you.
No of course you're not ... that's why you blitz this place with scriptural quotes isn't it?
(November 7, 2008 at 2:42 pm)Daystar Wrote: Just educate you on the Bible.
Thanks but no thanks ... not only (in my experience) do atheists tend to know an awful lot more about the bible than their Christina adversaries but I'm a recovering ex-Christian so it might be well to assume we actually know the odd thing or two.
Kyu
(November 8, 2008 at 11:13 am)ManofGOD Wrote: This is foolishness. Is it not said: A fool returns to his folly like a dog returns to his vomit.
Pretty much sums up the religious doesn't it?
Kyu
