In my head there seems to be two ways to think. Linear sets a course that does not entertain suggestions without judicial evidence and leads to a new conclusion.
Circular sets a course that can lead back to the original thought without a conclusion or a non-judicial conclusion.
For instance on a graph if random points do not average a intersection of a straight line can only develope a circular line.
This thought is strictly out of my head and has no educational origin because I haven't read or study philosophy. But I am a deep thinker and get quite immersed in my thoughts.
So is this a fair assumption , be it elementry or intermediate?
Circular sets a course that can lead back to the original thought without a conclusion or a non-judicial conclusion.
For instance on a graph if random points do not average a intersection of a straight line can only develope a circular line.
This thought is strictly out of my head and has no educational origin because I haven't read or study philosophy. But I am a deep thinker and get quite immersed in my thoughts.
So is this a fair assumption , be it elementry or intermediate?
