RE: Attack or retreat?
October 22, 2009 at 2:41 pm
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2009 at 2:42 pm by Violet.)
Quote:Yeah you do lots of obfuscating.Cite example? Blow my mind: cite two?
Quote:Seemingly you don't want to answer some questions. I just with you'd simply say that rather than fluff an answer.Did I not specifically state that I will not answer some questions, with the cited reason that the answers would change your mind about many things and also lead to a great deal of unnecessary stress?
Quote:We're all here to communicate, you are apparently not??I don't post specifically for you, fr0d0. I am writing in a way that I think most people should understand... but if that is too 'complex?' in some way: I can dumb my posts down, remove all of my semi-archaic and unique writing style, and never use metaphor or any other 'advanced?' literary device.
Of course, I don't see why anyone would want me to do that... but perhaps there is a reason?
Quote:That's how I've always understood existentialism.. it entertains the ultimately ridiculous.Indeed, and I entertain everything you say, think about it myself for a bit, and respond with questions to your statements, jokes made on the spot about them (especially if they seem ridiculous), and often refute them because of something I perceive wrong within them. I even agree with you about half the time fr0d0, and I often show my agreement in the form of part of a post, or as a thumbs up
Anyway, if you have a problem with me: that is what the <negative part of the> rep. system is for. If I'm posting over your head, and you dislike that (and it seems many things I say?).... then why not give me a negative rep to tell me so, instead of hearing me repeatedly 'obfuscate?' with my refutations to your statements?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
