(January 19, 2013 at 1:20 am)catfish Wrote: "Maybe it's not completely conclusive evidence"
Fucking wishy-washy fundie fucktard atheist appologist!
Have fun, you can fuck off now.
.
Ah, I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were a buffoon. I feel bad for wasting so much time talking to you.
Hey moron? Yeah, I said it's not entirely convincing evidence, and you know why? Because I was being fucking intellectually honest! Maybe it's a foreign concept to you, but to me it's worth something. Was Surtr's position completely, one hundred percent proven? No, but he made a good start. And I also left provisions in case you ever decided to join the argument by providing proof of your position, because, well, maybe you did have some case to argue, and just weren't, for some unfathomable reason.
Instead, you decide to mock me for not having the same level of brash, pig-ignorant confidence in everything I say. Sorry, but my positions are contingent on the facts, and being true to reality and honest with myself is more important than appearing to be right all the time. Maybe someday you'll grow up enough to have the same belief.
Until then, and until you decide to argue your case, I wash my hands of you, you arrogant turd. I should have done so many posts ago, because this kind of victory for my position by default is entirely unfulfilling.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!