RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 22, 2013 at 1:27 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2013 at 1:34 am by Gilgamesh.)
(January 22, 2013 at 12:36 am)Shell B Wrote: Yep. Flaming. You know you are not advocating quite what he is protesting, yet you are using language that does not concisely display your viewpoint because you enjoy getting a rise out of him. It's not that hard to see. Yes, clearly instances that are not rape at all are too poorly defined, but anyone can see that is not what most people are protesting. Would you say a ten-year-old can ever be mature enough to have consensual sex with a 40 year old man given the parameters of human development as they are now? Probably not. I'm pretty sure it is that sort of sick shit that Germans is protesting, and I'm pretty sure you know it.Nope. Answering only what has been asked - and not bringing in the fallacies and assumptions. Basically, precision; staying strictly on point. I don't care what he - or anyone - is protesting here. All I did is answer questions precisely and honestly.
When I'm looking for a rise is when I acknowledge a bunch of irrelevant 'pleasantries' and respond with "umad?"
