RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 22, 2013 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2013 at 1:48 am by Shell B.)
Oh, please. You've made those kind of responses throughout. Being concise or even expanding your argument so that it is more clear (remember, introducing more to your argument sometimes helps it) is not introducing fallacies. Introducing fallacies is introducing fallacies. Besides, you have been guilty of the fallacy of vagueness a number of times in this thread. Unless you define an age at which you do find it inappropriate, one must assume that there is no age where it is inappropriate in your mind. Yes, I know, you're arguing about maturity, which is different for every person. However, sexual maturity is defined by biology, and you could certainly set parameters in that direction. Instead, you continue to be vague. Either you know you are being vague and enjoy making Germans incensed or you are using the word fallacy without even knowing you have committed one repeatedly. It hardly matters to me either way. It amuses me when people get pissed at me too. I just think three pages could have been avoided if you said what you thought was disgusting and what wasn't with some level of clarity. Of course, Germans went off his shit about it without realizing you were fucking with him or not caring because of the topic matter.
And this is why we can't have mature discussions.
And this is why we can't have mature discussions.
