RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 22, 2013 at 2:12 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2013 at 2:22 am by Gilgamesh.)
(January 22, 2013 at 1:47 am)Shell B Wrote: Being concise or even expanding your argument so that it is more clear (remember, introducing more to your argument sometimes helps it) is not introducing fallacies.
This is true.
Quote: Besides, you have been guilty of the fallacy of vagueness a number of times in this thread.The fallacy of Vagueness occurs only when the appearance of soundness in an argument depends upon vagueness in its terms. I've already said that there is no 'magic age.' I deem it appropriate when the individual deems it appropriate for themselves (they want to have sex.)
(January 22, 2013 at 2:11 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: Shell might be annoying, you are just revolting.i luv u 5ever! <3
(January 22, 2013 at 1:46 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: You just annoy people and should finaly consider getting a life which consists of more than that.You see that guy in my signature? That is god. I'm working my ass off to become a god, myself. I like to annoy heathens along the way.
