Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?

[Shell B]

The fallacy of Vagueness occurs only when the appearance of soundness in an argument depends upon vagueness in its terms. I've already said that there is no 'magic age.' I deem it appropriate when the individual deems it appropriate for themselves (they want to have sex.)

Gibberish. You are discussing a term that comes in small increments, seconds, minutes, days, weeks, months, years, decades, etc. The soundness in this argument depends upon clarifying the terms. Otherwise, it is valid, but not sound. To set absolutely no terms in regard to age, you are saying that you can take away or add a year and it makes no difference. The problem with this is that the spectrum ends in zero. For your argument to be sound, you would have to be saying that there is nothing wrong with having sex with a two month old, as long as it cooed in an accepting manner. Given that there is a cut off age where puberty has never occurred in a human, you could logically set that as the magic age, but you are clearly not thinking it through.

---

I dont care what you do!!! it is 7 in the morning and I am not even in the condition to spell my own name!

I would say that is hardly the time to get up in arms with someone who wasn't even fucking arguing with you, you intolerable pissant. I agree with you on many occasions. Fuck, I even think you are funny sometimes. However, your lack of ability to read what the fuck I am writing before you get all testy and personal is ridiculous. Technically, that was an unprovoked personal attack. I would resort to gratuitous use of exclamation points, but I do try ever so hard not to post when I can't spell my own name and get testy for no reason. Now, relax, dude. I have only just now responded to you, so you can ignore everything else in the thread that I have written, as it does not apply to you.