Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 31, 2025, 5:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
#54
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
Desire for sex? First off, to be capable to enter a sexual releationship one needs to be capable to understand that desire, to be educated on sex "aufgeklährt" as we say.

Second, puperty is reached at the age of 11 for a eleven year old child to engage in any kind of sexual activity is not justifyable.
Because one cannot expect kids at that age to be well enought educated on sex, aswell as it might encourage people of older age to engage in sexual activities with such young kids.
Third, which is why a age of consent is determined by when a child which has reached puperty might be capable to understand the concept of sexuality, meaning not just biological but also legal matters, a age must be reached where the teenage is capable to understand when he or she would be sexualy abused.
Fourth a teen is not an adult, an adult is someone who is capable to take responsibility for his own actions in a court of law. This age is determined by a countries legislation and is in most cases set between the age of 18 - 21. At that age one is no longer considered a teen nore a child and therefor expects from that person to act responsibly towards children and teens.
To use someone younger who might not even understand sexuality for ones sexual plessure as an adult is abuse and therefor should be punishable.

And the punishment should be severe since because of the resulting trauma and effects of sexual abuse it is in some countries even acknowleged to be a form of tourchure.

(January 22, 2013 at 2:28 am)Shell B Wrote: I would say that is hardly the time to get up in arms with someone who wasn't even fucking arguing with you, you intolerable pissant. I agree with you on many occasions. Fuck, I even think you are funny sometimes. However, your lack of ability to read what the fuck I am writing before you get all testy and personal is ridiculous. Technically, that was an unprovoked personal attack. I would resort to gratuitous use of exclamation points, but I do try ever so hard not to post when I can't spell my own name and get testy for no reason. Now, relax, dude. I have only just now responded to you, so you can ignore everything else in the thread that I have written, as it does not apply to you.

I guess first impressions stick the longest. I will try to forget the image I have of of you, of being a arrogant imature whatever who get`s some kick out of annoying people.
And try to be nice or at least take you serious.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions? - by Something completely different - January 22, 2013 at 2:52 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PLEASE add Soundcloud support bennyboy 73 10192 June 29, 2016 at 1:14 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Noobie tech support issue LadyForCamus 8 2722 December 7, 2015 at 8:55 pm
Last Post: vorlon13



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)