Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?

[Shell B]

This is where I get lost. I don't know what you mean. I'm thinking that once someone has started puberty, and if they now have the desire for sex, and if mature enough mentally, should be aloud to have sex. Of course, what constitutes a mature mind is subjective.

You start puberty well before you are capable of truly having/enjoying sex. Boys start puberty before their sexual organs are fully developed. Basically, what I am saying is that we have never observed sexual maturity below a certain age, though I honestly haven't bothered to look up what that is. For the sake of clarity, you could have stated that age or hinted at it, anyway. To be honest, though, I now don't give a shit if you piss him off. He does hold grudges and now I don't particularly care if there is coherent conversation in this thread.

By the way, Germans, I do not bring up vagueness in arguments with you. I bring up inconsistency. We've had the conversation twice, which is hardly every conversation I have because "words are all I have." Also, that is such a ludicrous statement. In a debate, words are all anyone has. Sorry if mine are more coherent than yours. I will try to dumb it down for you next time.

---

I guess first impressions stick the longest. I will try to forget the image I have of of you, of being a arrogant imature whatever who get`s some kick out of annoying people.
And try to be nice or at least take you serious.

Don't bother. I'm seen in a negative light by more than one person here and it definitely shows a person's intellectual integrity when they are more concerned with whether they think I am mature or polite enough than if my argument is good. While I personally don't dislike you nor will I hold you to the silliness of conversations long past, it will not concern me in the slightest if you think poorly of me. Indeed, it is better for a person to think less of you than what you are than to expect more from you than that of which you are capable.