(January 22, 2013 at 7:31 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response: Then if evolution is true based on you claiming to observed it in a lab, then according to your logic, Big Foot exists and Tupac is still alive, because people claim to have seen them as well. So unless you accept that they exist as well, then according to your own logic, your evidence is fasle, thus evolution is false.
Hey, mister can't-do-a-quote, you do know the difference between a source and a credible source, don't you? What is the difference between 'evidence' and 'verifiable evidence?'
And you still haven't answered my question: You come down with MRSA. Are you going to accept treatment that was developed because medical researchers acknowledge that bacteria evolves?
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
