Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?

[Violet]

The fact that the law is against it, laws are not created through a irrational process, they are created by taking facts into consideration.
Such as the legal age at which one reaches adulthood, the pedagogic studies which are dedicated to these specific subjects and etc.

Really? If some laws aren't created through irrational processes then...

http://www.dumblaws.com/law/10

(edit @ the below: The president himself must swear upon the Bible Many state laws contradict this federal one. So much for rational process)

http://www.dumblaws.com/law/1352

As for specifically the 'legal age of adulthood'... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority#Age_14

*There is a country in this world where the legal 'age of adulthood' is as low as 14... and there are countries in this world where the legal 'age of adulthood' is as high as 21*

Based on a seven-year difference in opinion... I'm going to call any concern for a 14-year old being considered 'adult enough' to make the vast and wide majority of their own decisions: bullshit.

Show me your studies, define adulthood, and I will proceed to show you why the are philosophically worthless in estimation of mid-late teenagers as potentially adults, so long as an utterly retarded arbitrary age-line is not invoked as the definition of 'adulthood' (which would immediately cease to really mean anything as a result).

And that young woman will simply have to wait until she is 18, or the man has to, since he would be the purpertrator in the crime.

Why *should* they have to wait? I've yet to see a good answer for this... and it is probably equally common that the youngster is male in these cases (cougars, yknow).

And what crime is happening, exactly?