The logical consequences of omnipotence

[fr0d0]

You said I was 'ignorant of the facts'. Then when I refuted that claim, you said that I had the information but didn't understand it--and then justified your calling me ignorant by saying that I lacked 'knowledge'. So yes, you did say that, between saying two other things that contradict it.

We have a basic comprehension fail here. You can't understand the simple statement that you reply to. You have the information, but you don't understand it.

Misunderstanding is never a correct interpretation. If that were so someone would have successfully defeated it. That isn't the case.

The only rational stance that you have is your world view.

You realize I could say the exact same about you, right? We have the same infomation, but we come to different conclusions. You say that I don't understand the facts, which here means that I am wrong in my interpretation of them. I, believing that I am right and that you aren't, could say that you're the one who doesn't understand the information. See how that works? All it really means is 'I think you're wrong'.

If your interpretation was even close to viable, that statement might hold true.

Look at the wildly inaccurate conclusions that you continually reach about my position. You don't understand it so how can you say I'm wrong? Please try to stick to saying things you know, rather than things you don't know.