RE: Why Was I Banned?
January 28, 2013 at 5:15 am
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2013 at 5:18 am by Gilgamesh.)
(January 28, 2013 at 5:04 am)Napoléon Wrote: Hypocrite.Nope.
I didn't tell anyone not to personally attack - or insult - or whatever other people. I was actually going to include myself in the post where I mentioned people who will soon foresee bans.
Quote:The difference with BGChuckLee on the otherhand is his was a personal attack (in the first instance of his banning) as it was directed directly at Vae on one of her photos where he was being downright insulting and degrading (at least IMO). It wasn't so much what he said, but what he meant by his comment that was disgusting.What BGChuckLee said was so subtly an attack and arguably, wasn't necessarily meant to be an attack - but more a statement of preference.
But since it was an 'attack' (maybe) it deserves more a punishment than the run-of-the-mill "Fuck you, you useless troll trash, and go die" 'insults.'
Quote: it's ironic how all of a sudden we seem to see you taking the moral high ground for a guy you apparently couldn't give two fucks about.I have not claimed to be taking a moral high ground but I'm flattered for you to have perceived it that way, sir. Also, whether I care about someone or not matters little in my correcting unreason. I am a warrior of free-thought! Whoooo!
Quote:Yet when they get angry about it and tell you to fuck off, which any normal person probably would if lamented with such an accusation, you'll sit there and use their response as though it somehow proves your point? No you moron. That's not how bullying works.Nope. I don't think someone choosing to express anger towards me, rather than offer a rebuttal, leaves my position correct by default.
Quote:My last two fucking cents on the topic, good day to everyone on this stinkin' pile of shit thread.Nice denouncing of this thread, man. You hoisted yourself way up above us mongrels, who dare take this thread, (or the discussion being had in it, currently) seriously.