Bald Prophets are Dangerous

[Cyberman]

Drich: our very own grandmaster in the art of verbal white noise. Or does that lot actually mean something, relevant or not? I recognise many of the words, it's just that I can't help feeling they'd object to being knitted together in that way.

They who?

Nope, they what. It's called context - you remember, that stuff that non-desperate-theists are always forgetting. Here's a clue; (please do try to keep up):

I recognise many of the words, it's just that I can't help feeling they'd object to being knitted together in that way.

You are aware that a plurality of anything can be referred to as a "they", don't you? It's not just people. That I chose to impart human feelings onto items incapable of them is a literary device called the pathetic fallacy.

I have no idea where you dragged the rest of your crap from, viz:

Those who would use the words of the bible to place a leading world religion under one MAN'S rule? Or are you saying that the one who came and "up set the apple cart" by completing the law which took and turn Judaism on it head, would be upset even after he threw the old way of worship away without replacing it line by line with a new one? All Christ left us with is what we call the Greatest commands. He told us that all of the law would be completed under these two commands 1 love God with all of your being and the second love your neighbor as your self. So if one mans complete love looks different than another's is the one man supposed to just fall in to a standard worship even if he is only giving 50% of himself to that worship? No of course not. That is why we split and have division. So everyone can worship at capacity.

and of course you are perfectly entitled to express it; but it has nothing to do with anything I said and I'd appreciate not being dragged into your paranoid fantasies, if you'd be so kind.