Bald Prophets are Dangerous

[Esquilax]

If the content of my posts can so easily be identified as lacking of substance then why haven't you identified any of these passages?

There's one on this very page: Stimbo showed you very clearly what he meant by context, and your response was to ask him to show you what he meant. No substance, and if you refuse to see it, that's hardly anyone else's problem.

Why is each and every appeal to dismiss my work based on The superfical and not on actual content?

You would need to start posting things with content first.

You do know the quickest way to dismiss a message is to find inconsistencies in content. so why may I ask is such a smart and 'well educated' person such as yourself only response based on an appeal to probability?

Show one fucking sentence in the post you quoted where Cinjin relied on an appeal to probability, and then we'll talk.

did you see what I did there? I isolated a legitimate inconsistency in your base logic, identified it (appeal to probability which is a Formal fallacy) then I moved to dismiss the body of your posts by summing up the body of your work as being based in a logical fallacy. I will now lock you into this logical fallacy of your own creation by challenging you to prove that what you believe to be true about me, is indeed true.

Your willful ignorance of your own lack of substance doesn't make it vanish, it just makes you blind.

How's that? I posted this from my ipad (with auto correct) with no spelling errors for you to crutch an argument together with, it kind puts a little more sting in what I have to say doesn't it?

Given that you misspelled both 'merit' and 'intellectual' (twice!) I'd say you need a bit more work. Sting removed.

That is why I ask;
What is wrong with sharing who I truly am? Flaws and all? I am not looking to project myself a certain way nor do I look to fit a specific profile. If you are to judge me then let it be on actual content. If the content is lacking or suspect then ask me to show you where it is based and or how I came to a given conclusion. If however appealing to logical fallacies is all you have left in you then know your work will be labeled accordingly and dismissed.

It would be easier to show you if you'd listen. However, it is nice of you to admit that this smug, baselessly arrogant character you've shown here is your real one. I like that candor.