Bald Prophets are Dangerous

[Cinjin]

---

And yet you regularly have a cooked-up bull shit answer for everything.

The man doesn't know god from the hole in his butt - has no education to back up anything - openly admits that it's hard to validate and incorporate the Bible and yet consistently shoots his mouth off about what god "really" is ... as if he's some kind of prophet with all the secret codes.

He sells so much bull shit now that he contradicts himself daily. How apropos for a sheep.



...such good "work" you're doing here ... [large enough eye-roll could not be found]

---

If the content of my posts can so easily be identified as lacking of substance then why haven't you identified any of these passages? Why is each and every appeal to dismiss my work based on The superfical and not on actual content? You do know the quickest way to dismiss a message is to find inconsistencies in content. so why may I ask is such a smart and 'well educated' person such as yourself only response based on an appeal to probability? Is this how you were taught to think (in logical fallacies?) or did you come up with this thought process on your own?

Really? You're going to accuse me of not "identifying passages?" First of all, your posts are not "passages" as you are not writing scripture here; you're writing your own semi-christian rhetoric. Secondly, every time I refute one of your ridiculous claims about Christianity, I am indeed identifying your "passage." You may be too thick to grasp this concept, but I'll try again. If you write some nonsense about some prophet killing adults and my following post calls you out on it, that is indeed me identifying your bull shit. Ergo, I have identified your "passages" many many many times. You are making up a massive lie to make a point you do not have.

did you see what I did there? I isolated a legitimate inconsistency in your base logic, identified it (appeal to probability which is a Formal fallacy) then I moved to dismiss the body of your posts by summing up the body of your work as being based in a logical fallacy. I will now lock you into this logical fallacy of your own creation by challenging you to prove that what you believe to be true about me, is indeed true. So again if you can show where any of my arguments are contextually lacking in reference or exegetical support then your sweeping generalization may actually have Merritt. If not Sport, then I'd say it is your argument that lacks intelectual integrity, and if you choose to stand behind your literally baseless accusations and sweeping generalizations, then you too can be quickly identified and labeled as lacking intelectual integrity.

I think you need to look up what a logical fallacy actually is, and then point out exactly where I used one according to the actual definition and not your own "special godly definition." Furthermore, this portion of your post looks like a copy and paste job, which would further explain why it doesn't seem to really coincide to what I wrote. It looks like you found some fancy verbose wording in another thread somewhere and clumsily forced it into your response. It doesn't even apply to what I said: contextually lacking? Get over yourself. I didn't reference some theological remark you made. Did you even write that portion??

How's that? I posted this from my ipad (with auto correct) with no spelling errors for you to crutch an argument together with, it kind puts a little more sting in what I have to say doesn't it?

[facepalm and muttering] jesus fucking christ ....

..And we are not even really speaking with one's deeply held religious beliefs. We are just jabbing at each Other's pride. Now imagine being de balled by someone who has all the answers you have been looking for religiously/spiritually, but seems completely superior to you in every way. Even if a prick like that did know God no one want anything to do with him. Especially is he approaches everyone with the one ups manship attitdude you are advocating.

I'm not jabbing at your pride. I'm treating you the way you treat everyone on this site. I'm stating what I "KNOW" to be true. You are an authority on nothing. You're simply some peon who had a dream. Nothing you say about god or the bible is any more legitimate than any of the other sheep. You want respect? You and I both know exactly why you're on this site. It's better to be an infamous douche bag on an Atheist site than an unknown, unwanted, UN-substantiated lunatic on a Christian Forum. "Real christians don't get visions from god," but you already know that your brothers-in-christ look down on you don't you? Don't bother, I grow weary of your lies.

That is why I ask;
What is wrong with sharing who I truly am? Flaws and all? I am not looking to project myself a certain way nor do I look to fit a specific profile. If you are to judge me then let it be on actual content. If the content is lacking or suspect then ask me to show you where it is based and or how I came to a given conclusion. If however appealing to logical fallacies is all you have left in you then know your work will be labeled accordingly and dismissed.

I judge you only on your content. I assure you, if you start a thread about lawn care, I won't say a fucking word.

It is better to keep ones mouth closed and have others wonder if he is a fool. Than to open it, and prove everyone right.
-last nights fortune cookie

You should've payed that cookie attention.