Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 20, 2025, 5:24 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
We really are insegnificant

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
We really are insegnificant
Zone Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Agnostic Atheist
Posts: 544
Threads: 9
Joined: January 7, 2013
Reputation: 3
#8
RE: We really are insegnificant
February 2, 2013 at 11:19 am (This post was last modified: February 2, 2013 at 11:26 am by Zone.)
(January 30, 2013 at 7:22 pm)Ryantology Wrote: If the universe is a giant, enormous, magnificently dumb machine, as appears to be the case.

It does appear to be the case but then it was deliberately crafted by all powerful being in order so there will be people in it to worship him. And if you do that, a certain way, you then be rewarded after you die with eternal nice whatever goes on. Argument from fine tuning because we all know that machines are intelligently designed.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
We really are insegnificant

Messages In This Thread
We really are insegnificant - by Gooders1002 - January 30, 2013 at 6:13 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - January 30, 2013 at 6:58 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Dee Dee Ramone - January 30, 2013 at 7:03 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - January 30, 2013 at 7:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 2, 2013 at 11:19 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zen Badger - February 6, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cyberman - February 5, 2013 at 1:31 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 2, 2013 at 12:11 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cinjin - February 2, 2013 at 1:06 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Sedna - February 2, 2013 at 1:40 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - February 5, 2013 at 12:52 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 6, 2013 at 12:45 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 5, 2013 at 12:58 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Nine - February 5, 2013 at 1:02 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 5, 2013 at 3:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 6, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by ManMachine - February 6, 2013 at 8:52 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)