The following article seems a bit biased and unfounded to me. I would like your input. I personally believe that humans are detrimental to the planet, but I would like to hear from those of you who support the thinking promoted in the attached article.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrick...e-century/
Now, if I need to re-adjust my thinking simply because I do not have all the information, I will do so, but I see no reason for global warming scientists to lie. However, if they are and you can present a valid reason for such blatant falsifications, I will gladly reconsider my position.
The evidence that I have seen seems to point towards a planet that is warming at an alarming rate.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrick...e-century/
Article Wrote:The most accurate measures of temperature come from satellites. Since the start of these measurements in 1979, they show minor fluctuations and an insignificant net change in global temperature.
Is the earth getting dangerously warm? Probably not, since the earth was warmer than it is now in 7000 of the last 10,000 years. By the way, does anybody know what the “right” amount of global heat is?
Now, if I need to re-adjust my thinking simply because I do not have all the information, I will do so, but I see no reason for global warming scientists to lie. However, if they are and you can present a valid reason for such blatant falsifications, I will gladly reconsider my position.
The evidence that I have seen seems to point towards a planet that is warming at an alarming rate.