RE: Ignorant Fucks
February 5, 2013 at 1:52 pm
(This post was last modified: February 5, 2013 at 1:58 pm by hertsdelivery.)
(February 5, 2013 at 1:43 pm)Cinjin Wrote:(February 5, 2013 at 1:23 pm)hertsdelivery Wrote: I won't reply to you after this for misquoting me. That's a cowardly thing to do and shows you seak winning an argument over seeking truth.
Please anyone reading this thread, ensure you read my original post before. This person's quotation marks are misleading.
Misleading or Misquoting? There's a big difference.
From what I can tell, German kept it mostly in context, but I would recommend exiting this thread and joining a thread more conducive to your sensibilities. It would seem rather clear to me that a man of your sensitive nature might want to steer clear of this thread based solely on the Thread Title.
On the other hand ...
Many new members here feign being offended simply so they can get into a verbal altercation with a more established member.
You sir, will be remembered as the muslim who came here calling names and verbally poking the lion.
I'm not offended, I found the conversation immature. But by previous admission, I clearly chose the wrong thread to read and will gladly look around the site further.
I didn't think I called anyone names just explained how that I thought you were damaging your reputation as a rational minded group of people. But if you don't believe you are then by all means carry on

I didn't think 'German' kept it in context personally. And misleadinf and misquoting are indeed different. But I'm not sure what that's got to do with it? I felt I was misquoted and so anyone reading the misquote may be misled.
Finally, I hope I'm not remembered like that

(February 5, 2013 at 1:47 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote:(February 5, 2013 at 1:36 pm)hertsdelivery Wrote: LOL. Now you're goading me? Fair enough, if that's how you want to roll
Anyway, the particular misquote was "but...... atheists are 10 year olds and irrational". I did not call atheists irrationa., I said that the comments on this particular thread was not befitting of those that describe themselves as rational, and that they should behave better in future if they want to retain that good reputation (obviously in not so many words). I also did not call atheists 10 year olds (although I'm sure some are). I said that many commenters on this post were behaving like 10 year olds. That is entirely deifferent.
I'm not repoting you or seeking to get you banned, but please don't misquote me.
black marked one: So in other words: Irrational.
And who are you to say what kind of behavior is beffiting for people who call themselves rational? And who says that every atheist in this forum is rational?
black marked 2: What are you talking about? What good reputation? Is there somekind of scale on which people with different opinions and faiths have their reputations listed?
black marked 3: ???? You write in a condacending and judgemental way and then insist that you are not being condacending! When I am condacending I at least stand to my post!
Just stop digging your own grave by making judgements over those on the forum you happen to disaprove of in questions of faith and language and post your own opinions so everyone can see what makes you so much better than someone who supposedly "behaves like a 10 year old".
And were the fuck do you live that ten year olds use words such as fuck to describe their sufisticated views on organised religion?
I don't think I'm digging, I think you're just getting mopre elaborate and silly about the fact that you found my post irritaing. I regret that you are clearly offended but I stand by my post. I don't have time to continue to answer all your petty points (as they are in my opinion). I think almost every point on here is very opinionated (as it should be) and some are far more condescending than mine, but you don't seem to be able to handle it. So I will bid you farewell. Oh and I live in England, ten year olds say much worse all the time



