new testament, matthew chapter 2

[John V]

I also want to point out the blatant LIE of you claiming that I introduced that passage, just sayin...
stupid fucking socks...

Here's the post:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-16992-po...#pid396689
Please show the post prior to this in which I mentioned the passage on the adulteress.

Dude, you agreed that those didn't support infallibility, then you claim it did.
You presented 2 separate statements that conflicted with your beliefs, which of course, makes you a liar...
We're done here...
.

The post to which I agreed (#96) did not quote me or refer to specific posts or passages. The last statement in the post which preceded it regarded the adulteress passage. Therefore, I was agreeing that the adulteress passage does not support infallibility, but rather addresses forgiveness etc. If you were referring to something else, you should have specified it. Absent that I have to assume you're referring to the preceding statement.