Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 19, 2025, 6:06 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
We really are insegnificant
#18
RE: We really are insegnificant
(February 5, 2013 at 2:15 am)Ryantology Wrote: All human-made machines are intelligently-designed, but practically all human mechanical endeavors emulate natural systems. There are many examples of machines which are not intelligently-designed: the human body for starters.

The human body is a part of the natural universe as a whole so if the universe were intelligently designed then the human body would be by extension as part of a directional process. It's close to deism but all you need do is claim that God can also interact with the universe. By keeping God distinct from the universe pantheism is avoided as well. So I think Christians are fine when it comes to science there's little to threaten them from that direction.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
We really are insegnificant - by Gooders1002 - January 30, 2013 at 6:13 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - January 30, 2013 at 6:58 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Dee Dee Ramone - January 30, 2013 at 7:03 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - January 30, 2013 at 7:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 2, 2013 at 11:19 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zen Badger - February 6, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cyberman - February 5, 2013 at 1:31 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 2, 2013 at 12:11 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cinjin - February 2, 2013 at 1:06 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Sedna - February 2, 2013 at 1:40 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - February 5, 2013 at 12:52 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 6, 2013 at 12:45 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 5, 2013 at 12:58 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Nine - February 5, 2013 at 1:02 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 5, 2013 at 3:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 6, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by ManMachine - February 6, 2013 at 8:52 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)