Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 7:35 am
Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
We really are insegnificant

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
We really are insegnificant
Zone Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Agnostic Atheist
Posts: 544
Threads: 9
Joined: January 7, 2013
Reputation: 3
#21
RE: We really are insegnificant
February 6, 2013 at 7:04 am (This post was last modified: February 6, 2013 at 7:05 am by Zone.)
(February 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Certainly, Christians can claim that God did it. They can and will claim that about everything. But, who cares? The people responsible for actually figuring out how the universe works generally do not care about their ridiculous claims.

"Je n'ai pas eu besoin de cette hypothèse."

But then of course (according to these books I read) the human mind can only understand the universe in such a methodical rationalistic way because the universe itself is a product of a rational mind. Therefore science itself is concrete evidence for God and we can thank him for the progress we make.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
We really are insegnificant

Messages In This Thread
We really are insegnificant - by Gooders1002 - January 30, 2013 at 6:13 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - January 30, 2013 at 6:58 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Dee Dee Ramone - January 30, 2013 at 7:03 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - January 30, 2013 at 7:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 2, 2013 at 11:19 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 2:15 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zen Badger - February 6, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cyberman - February 5, 2013 at 1:31 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 2, 2013 at 12:11 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Cinjin - February 2, 2013 at 1:06 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Sedna - February 2, 2013 at 1:40 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Violet - February 5, 2013 at 12:52 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 6, 2013 at 12:45 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by justin - February 5, 2013 at 12:58 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Nine - February 5, 2013 at 1:02 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Confused Ape - February 5, 2013 at 3:22 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Ryantology - February 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm
RE: We really are insegnificant - by Zone - February 6, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: We really are insegnificant - by ManMachine - February 6, 2013 at 8:52 am



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)