The overwhelming consensus of scientist dedicated to studying climate change agree that it is real and man made. I was trained and worked as a scientist for ten years. So when someone suggested it wasn't true, I went to the journals, read a couple reputable books, and feel comfortable saying with 100 % confidence that it is true and man made. If you are not a scientist how would you judge? You might read this:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy...apers.html
Like high level philosophical arguments, consensus of experts can be a sign. JD
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy...apers.html
Like high level philosophical arguments, consensus of experts can be a sign. JD


