I think what Hitler did was what indeed grossly immoral. As do the majority of people I think! Now whether morals are objective or not, this doesn't change this fact.
If everyone didn't believe in subjective morals, then those who think that means there's no reason to be moral, obviously don't really care - they are only interested in morality if there were rules to follow...
It would be a huge misconception to think that because morals aren't objective then we can't do good. If some people would think that, then they are mistaken and that doesn't change the fact of whether there actually are objective morals or not. In either case, whether that would make the world better or worse because of how people reacted to the lack of belief in objective morals - that wouldn't change the fact of the matter. Are there actually any objective morals? I know of no evidence of any...
And also, if everyone didn't believe in objective morals, you couldn't really say that many people would then not give a fuck...because if no one believed in objective morals then we would be living in a completely different world wouldn't we? Because some people of course do believe in objective morals like yourself.
Whether you think it's more moral or not if morals are objective, that has got nothing to do with the reality of the matter, nothing to do with the actual question "Do objective morals actually exist?" ... "Is there actually any evidence of them?"
Since, I myself know of no evidence of objective morals, and since i don't believe in them - I think for some people to claim they exist and to absolutely know what they are: That form of absolutism causes much more trouble than if they simply trusted their own empathy and weren't so obstinate about their views.
EvF
If everyone didn't believe in subjective morals, then those who think that means there's no reason to be moral, obviously don't really care - they are only interested in morality if there were rules to follow...
It would be a huge misconception to think that because morals aren't objective then we can't do good. If some people would think that, then they are mistaken and that doesn't change the fact of whether there actually are objective morals or not. In either case, whether that would make the world better or worse because of how people reacted to the lack of belief in objective morals - that wouldn't change the fact of the matter. Are there actually any objective morals? I know of no evidence of any...
And also, if everyone didn't believe in objective morals, you couldn't really say that many people would then not give a fuck...because if no one believed in objective morals then we would be living in a completely different world wouldn't we? Because some people of course do believe in objective morals like yourself.
Whether you think it's more moral or not if morals are objective, that has got nothing to do with the reality of the matter, nothing to do with the actual question "Do objective morals actually exist?" ... "Is there actually any evidence of them?"
Since, I myself know of no evidence of objective morals, and since i don't believe in them - I think for some people to claim they exist and to absolutely know what they are: That form of absolutism causes much more trouble than if they simply trusted their own empathy and weren't so obstinate about their views.
EvF
