RE: AtlasS..
February 20, 2013 at 1:14 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2013 at 1:47 pm by WinterHold.)
(February 18, 2013 at 1:10 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Nothing important, just a cute delivery. Mostly, googly images has been shit for me, lately. Makes quickly nabbing an image a pain in the ass.
All the better, since I test to see if it works... and post it. Then I come back a few hours later/a day later: it no longer works. Infuriating, really.
yep, it gets more harder with time -looking for avatars in google-, back in the day I didn't remember any struggle finding any, maybe my taste was just crappier than now.
Thanks, Lilly, I'll add a small touch on that one & use it

(February 18, 2013 at 5:25 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: Agreed. Ran across my cousin having an argument on Facebook with this person, it's literally the funniest thing I've seen on FB!
Quote:"Canadians are such potheads! I mean just look at their flag, it has a pot leaf on it!!!"

This one precisely cracked me up. Problem is many don't even try the thing, but still talking about it like experts :/ I hate humans.
(February 20, 2013 at 6:08 am)Aractus Wrote: Interesting AtlasS. Are you claiming that crystal meth, cocaine, heroin cannot be used/taken responsibly with low risk?
Of course. "Responsibility" comes in when you can control what you're doing. It's impossible to take an addictive drug "responsibly", with heroin I feel it's a one needle ; then you'll probably get hooked. Weed is the negation of all that.
Sometimes I'm forced to cut down smoking & stop it, especially during exams which go for two weeks most of the time ; I don't feel a physical argue to smoke, it's a lot easier than quitting food !
Quote:He says plenty of things that are true and that I agree with. Any Devil, if I can use such a word, will mix the truth with lies for their advantage.
That's why we always need to look for people who don't chase their advantage when speaking politically ...
I never saw such a figure

Quote:She wants a minority and celebrity to be in the Senate, and she's parachuting this person into a "safe Labor seat" at the expense of the hardworking elected candidate that's currently serving and wants to continue serving. It's entirely racially motivated and giving preferential treatment to somebody with no political experience based on their race.
Oh, I think I remember hearing something about australia in the news before two weeks or so ; isn't this a result of defining the natives as "the real owners of the country" ? or something like that ?