RE: what being apart from the law means.
February 25, 2013 at 4:10 pm
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2013 at 4:27 pm by Drich.)
(February 25, 2013 at 12:28 pm)Ryantology Wrote: While rationalization of mass murder is what I expected from you, it does carries a fascinating implication: to claim that Jesus died for our sins is completely irrelevant, regardless of whether or not it actually happened.Let me guess you live in washington oregon or Northern califorina right? If you don't you're missing out on your true calling. Because you have some of the most refined cherry picking skills I have ever seen, and in those states Cherry pickers are held in very high regaurd.
Not only does this demonstrate, yet again, that you worship a bloodthirsty monster, but also an incompetent bungler (to protect Jesus' bloodline should require God to protect individuals, not the entire nation of Israel),
The answer I gave you was two fold. The First you tried to covered (protecting the line of Christ.) the second you ignored. (To full fill the Promise He had made to the Jews, In that they would be come a great nation that would bring fourth the savior of the World.) How were they Jews to become a great nation if it's enmeys were not destroyed?
Quote:it also means that Jesus sacrifice is not unique at all.It wasn't in that billions of animals had died for the same reason. It was in that He was the last that needed to make such a sacrifice.
Quote: There were countless millions of completely innocent children, toddlers, infants and unborn who died, according to you, for the sole reason that Jesus could one day live. They all died for my sins every bit as much as Jesus.Ah, no. "Millions" died so Isreal could become a great nation. Which is nothing new. Every 'great nation' was made 'great' by the deaths of millions of those who opposed their growth.
Quote:You've managed to show that your faith is even more fraudulent than I ever imagined.The same could have been said about your arguement.
(February 25, 2013 at 12:35 pm)catfish Wrote: It truly takes a sick fuck to condone human sacrifice too...No one is talking about Human sacrifice Fishy. We are talking about one nation of people Slaughtering the indiginous people of a given land to make room for their people. Before you get even more self righteous, Try and name me a modern civialization who foundations were not built on this principle.
It's Ok not to like this behaivor now, because the western civializations are at the top of the social ecconomic food chain as it were and any toppling of a civialization would ultimatly mean the loss of one of these 'great western' civializations. But just a few generations back it was a do or die. Now subtract 4000 years, and the fate of the entire Human race could have hung in the balance. The fact of the matter is Things needed to happen Exactly as they did in order for us (Humanity at large) to be where we are now.
(Basic Sci-fi/time travel 101, a Divergence in the time line seldom result in a positive outcome.) Meaning if one of the headhunter/canibalistic tribes the Jews put down were to have over taken them, then this world (if it made it this long) would have been a very different place. and, if your panties get in a twist about what the Jews did 4000 years ago, imagine the major cultures of the world based off of one of these caniablistic tribes.
