(February 26, 2013 at 7:40 am)Gabriel Syme Wrote: This fact shows up the "gay animals" rubbish for what it is. Animals fundamentally lack the capacity to use artificial means to overcome the physical state of their bodies, which is why we will never genuinely identify "gay animals" via them having penetrative 'sex' together. They simply cannot.
Oh wow, this actually saves me a lot of time. For a while I was fully intending to debate you on this point, but then you went ahead and- very kindly!- admitted that you are willingly being dishonest and distorting the facts in order to preserve your flat out wrong viewpoint! Thank you, I no longer have to waste my time dealing with you, you lying sod.

Though I will ask you one question: do you think your arbitrary definition of sex matters one jot to an animal? If they're performing all the actions associated with sex to an end of sexual enjoyment, what do you think is on their minds, if not sex?
Oh, and there's also this: you mentioned earlier that in your (bigoted, terrible) worldview, gay people can't really have sex. Given this... um, would that not then mean that gay animals exist anyway?
Essentially what you're saying is that gay people can't have sex because they don't interact in the traditional straight sex way, and then in the next breath you're saying that animals can't be gay for the same reason. Do you not see the contradiction?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!