RE: Should pedophilia be legal?
February 28, 2013 at 8:59 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2013 at 9:02 pm by Brian37.)
(February 28, 2013 at 8:45 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote:(February 28, 2013 at 8:29 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: All I've done is point out fallacious logic in this thread.
Have I overread that part?
In calm:
At the age of 10 to 11, children enter puperty - so before that time sex with such, is out of question and without any doubt should be illegal. The lack of sexual maturety means that having using such individuals for sexual means requires abuse, since the individual in question is incapable to participate due to it`s lack of the required biological functions. It is also importent to add that "the maturity" in the sence of personal maturity/understanding of the subject is not reached at that age, therefor an abuse and therefor exploitation of the child for sexualactivity would be required for sexual activity.
Which is why sexual activity with those who havent reached puperty is out of question since in all points it requires the abuse of the subject.
During puperty, as a child slowly evolves into adulthood, sexual activity by the young adult cannot be avoided. BUT, the evolving and discovering of a sexuality should be conducted by the individual and not inforced nore pressured on that individual, neighter should the trust of the individual be abused for the sexual activities of adults. A person in puperty may choose on it`s own behalf to have sex, and it should have the right to do so. It must stay underlines though that such an individual should not be pressured into sex.
plus (my input)
In legal terms it would be beyond foolish and outright stupid to lower the age of consent. Consent is oftern hard to define after cases of sexual abuse. Some abused children might have initialy agreed to their abuse from their abusers due to pressure, the legal age of consent is in place to make such offences punishable. So lowering the age of consent would simply give a sexual offender the legal rlaim to comit his crime within a still legal boundry. The age of consent should be determined by the young individuals personal needs for evolving it`s sexuality and not to cover the needs which some abuseive adults may have.
No they should NOT have the absolute right. I was a teen myself, I wanted it too. But I could have ruined my life by getting a girl pregnant, ESPECIALLY knowing now I never really wanted kids, but was told and bought that is what you do.
So even in wanting it, I get her pregnant, then I am stuck, and believe me back then I was only thinking about my dick, not my future.
The only thing you can do is EDUCATE THEM both about their bodies, contraception, disease, consent and monetary issues such as pregnancy and financial future, and advise them to WAIT. But they should not have any legal right to have sex, ESPECIALLY NOT with an adult.
"Kids are going to do it anyway", yea, but that is what parents are there for, not to judge them, but lead them.
So yea I agree, on top of maturity, lowering the age of consent would only allow the sick bastards a legal way to do it.


