(March 1, 2013 at 11:54 am)John V Wrote:(February 27, 2013 at 6:28 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Fuck off you turd!I didn't equate the two. I said that pedophiles have studied the tactics used to change public perception of homosexuality and are applying them, and will continue to do so.
Gay sex is consensual, pedophilia means unconsensual - therefor rape.
Your equasion is incriminating and disgusting!!!
Regarding the definitional debate: OP used "pedophilia" in the title, and that is attraction to prepubescent children.
HOWEVER, in the text he clearly mentioned acts and both prepubescent and sexually mature children: "What are your opinions of aduts having consensual sex with children and teenagers?"
(February 27, 2013 at 6:52 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: I think it's funny how often atheists on this forum will just assert moral values like if they're obvious.And it begins.
You obviously mean to slander gay relationships by suggesting that pedophilia will follow the tactics of the 'gay movement' in winning acceptance. However, almost no one here agrees with you that there is anything obviously wrong with gay relationships. So your attempted slander just makes you look like someone who is soft on pedophilia at the very least and possibly a proponent of sex with kids. (Are you a catholic priest by any chance?)
If you wish to slander homosexual relations you'd do better (but not well) to approach the topic head on. I'll bite. On what basis do you question the acceptability of homosexual relations? If your rationale has anything to do with the bible, forget it. The bible and Christianity generally are what have given cover to pedophiles for ages. Nothing wholesome can come from there.