(March 1, 2013 at 7:21 pm)whateverist Wrote: You obviously mean to slander gay relationships by suggesting that pedophilia will follow the tactics of the 'gay movement' in winning acceptance.First, that's not an obvious conclusion at all. By analogy, if someone were to show that nazi Germany based its propaganda on church practices, I wouldn't take that as slanderous to the church. Marketing practices can be used for good or ill. Your conclusion is baseless.
Second, I made a follow-up post explicitly clarifying that I was not equating the two. If you refuse to believe it, that's your bias showing.
Quote:However, almost no one here agrees with you that there is anything obviously wrong with gay relationships.But fifty years ago, many people thought just that. Heck, forty years ago the APA classified homosexuality as a mental disorder. Hence my observation that gays were very successful in changing public perception of them. If you actually thought about it, you'd realize that I am complimenting the LGBT movement.
Quote:So your attempted slander just makes you look like someone who is soft on pedophilia at the very least and possibly a proponent of sex with kids. (Are you a catholic priest by any chance?)I'm a father of three daughters, and if someone molests one of them, he better hope the police get to him before I do.
Quote:If you wish to slander homosexual relationsNo, I don't.