(November 10, 2009 at 3:54 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: I'm stating that Hitler and religion don't have much in common, and often people use Hitler as an excuse. I was not saying he was an Atheist or a Catholic or whatever because that is unknown (I'm not going to be an idiotheist and be all "HE WAS (blah) YOU FUCKTARDS GRARARHAFRGRGA FFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU!!!")
The OP was to pretty much say that you shouldn't really bring up the Holocaust/Hitler in a religious debate; it's a poor example, like Stalin (was it Stalin...?) who just happened to be Atheist and killed a shitload of people. He didn't kill in the name of Atheism, just like Hitler didn't kill in the name of whatever religion he was.
That's all I'm sayin'.
But, what part of this is giving you the most trouble?
Quote:Hitler seeking power, wrote in Mein Kampf. "... I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews. I am doing the Lord's work."
He may have been a psycho scumbag but everything else he wrote in Mein Kampf he tried to do. Why do you discount this? Surely, you know there are plenty of religious fuckwits throughout history who have used god as a cover for murder?
