RE: What is GOOD?
March 6, 2013 at 6:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2013 at 6:09 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(March 5, 2013 at 8:27 pm)genkaus Wrote: The primary choice of whether or not to act according to those traits (or work towards the goals) would be amoral. But, given that they are part of your nature, that would be an irrational choice.Sounds like this conclusion conflicts with any form of morality based on reason. You're just acting on a biological imperative that in itself is amoral. From a biological point of view, reason is only a tool of survival. Therefore the naturalist appeal to reason is just another form of 'might makes right', one that secures the 'qualitative' by-products which in themselves have no survival value.