(March 10, 2013 at 10:47 pm)jstrodel Wrote: genkaus, it seems like you and other users want to create a definition of atheism that soley based on 'de jure' considerations. I don't understand why that is. Why not define atheism based on the practical effects that atheism tends to have?
First of all, do you understand what 'de jure' means? Its a legal term, applicable in legal contexts, which this is not.
Secondly, there are no practical effects stemming from 'atheism'. Atheism is simply a small aspect of a person's philosophy and that is not the same for all atheists. So, it'd be impossible to define it - or rather, redefine it, since it already has a definition - based on your imagined practical effects.