(March 20, 2013 at 4:31 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Why we cannot assume that? can you explain the term time when there is no events or just one event?
I can describe it with no event.
Time is a function of spacetime.
(March 20, 2013 at 4:31 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Another way to understand it, forget about the term time
Let's call it RE (Relative events)
then replace the word time by RE in my proof
Relative events cannot be infinite, so there was some time where one event occurs at a time from a single source.
You are still using 'time' to describe your proof. Your statement above is fallacious.
(March 20, 2013 at 4:31 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: It is very obvious, Mutually exclusive events/adjectives cannot exist simultaneously, a static object will remain static forever till something change it.
This is the same arguement that St Thomas Aquinas used as one of his proofs for the existance of God. The Prime Mover, something must be the cause of the first movement therefore God [or in our case 'G'] is the only terminus to infinite regression. Which is patent nonsense.
(March 20, 2013 at 4:31 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This is impossible something cannot come from nothing. (paradox)
While I accept you may find the Physics behind this hard to comprehend it is theoretically possible and more importantly the theory fits with current M-Theory.
I can assure you it is not a paradox, in fact it is very reasonable if you have a mind that does not require a 'G' as a prop.
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
