Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 9, 2025, 6:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument from perpetual identity against naturalism.
#49
RE: Argument from perpetual identity against naturalism.
(March 20, 2013 at 12:35 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: As I stated, we can justify properly basic beliefs. For example, it's very possible to justify why we should appreciate our parents love and goodness towards us. BUT BUT...we believed in it first in a properly basic manner and a few of us seek justification after.

And your understanding of properly basic beliefs is not in the way people use the term. The way the term is used is not that other beliefs are not required in that belief, it's that it's not justified from inference.

It's not......?

"Foundationalism holds that all beliefs must be justified in order to be believed. Beliefs therefore fall into two categories:
Beliefs that are properly basic, in that they do not depend upon justification of other beliefs, but on something outside the realm of belief (a "non-doxastic justification")
Beliefs that derive from one or more basic beliefs, and therefore depend on the basic beliefs for their validity"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_belief
Clearly 'some' people use it this way...... I don't think that we're disagreeing over how "some" people use the term..yourself for example...but about whether or not "some" people's...yourself for example...use of the term is accurate...
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Argument from perpetual identity against naturalism. - by The Grand Nudger - March 20, 2013 at 12:39 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Questions about Belief and Personal Identity Neo-Scholastic 27 3551 June 11, 2021 at 8:28 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  [Serious] An Argument Against Hedonistic Moral Realism SenseMaker007 25 4553 June 19, 2019 at 7:21 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Argument against Intelligent Design Jrouche 27 4947 June 2, 2019 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  The Argument Against God's Existence From God's Imperfect Choice Edwardo Piet 53 11597 June 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 17347 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  The argument against "evil", theists please come to the defense. Mystic 158 76876 December 29, 2017 at 7:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Your position on naturalism robvalue 125 24136 November 26, 2016 at 4:00 am
Last Post: Ignorant
  2 Birds, 1 Stone: An argument against free will and Aquinas' First Way Mudhammam 1 1307 February 20, 2016 at 8:02 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Is personal identity really just mind? Pizza 47 9128 February 14, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Last Post: God of Mr. Hanky
  Presumption of naturalism Captain Scarlet 18 4800 September 15, 2015 at 10:49 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)