RE: California Proposition 8
November 19, 2008 at 11:22 am
(November 19, 2008 at 10:05 am)Daystar Wrote: (November 19, 2008 at 5:18 am)allan175 Wrote: When something reaches a point it can't (currently) be tested then, yes, there is plenty of faith & interpretation going on.
Then it evolves into another workable theory to keep it alive - for 200 years if need be.
I don't really get your point with that statement. Unless you are pointing at evolution in which case I still don't really see what you are implying with it.
(November 19, 2008 at 10:05 am)Daystar Wrote: (November 19, 2008 at 5:18 am)allan175 Wrote: In which case the "theory" is no more than an idea of how something *might* work. If more evidence is discovered that gives the theory more (or less) credence then there is less room for interpretation (and therefore less "faith" required).
All the while being held and preached as fact and all possible alternatives being dismissed.
I'm guessing you are hinting towards ID being dismissed by "evolutionists". If so then again, I'm not 100% sure what you are implying.
(November 19, 2008 at 10:05 am)Daystar Wrote: (November 19, 2008 at 5:18 am)allan175 Wrote: My skeptical view of religion (and indeed any supernatural thing) is simply that the person is a bit deluded and mis-interpreting something (and I'm sure they think the same of me!).
And yet you don't see the irony.
Haha.....As I said, I'm sure they think the same as I do (but the opposite views obviously).
(November 19, 2008 at 10:05 am)Daystar Wrote: Oh, and religion isn't a supernatural thing.
I didn't mean to imply it was. I just meant my view of religions is the same as my view of supernatural things.