It seems that Muslim Scholar is using Aristotle's unmoved mover inappropriately. Aristotle had no problem with an eternal universe. Aristotle was concerned with motion as it is now. My finger is moving toward the keyboard, the finger moves because there is an arm behind it. The arm moves because of the signals of the brain. The brain chooses because the soul is exercising its will. The end. Our souls are unmoved movers. Aristotle then looks at the stars rotating around. He thinks, "same process?". Stars have motion because something is giving them motion, no infinite regress, ergo God. However this proof is absolutely terrible. If Aristotle's physics wasn't so off perhaps he could have made a different proof or something, but friction or lack thereof really wasn't understood yet.
Anyway, I'm a theist, but unless you halt time, the argument will never work.
Anyway, I'm a theist, but unless you halt time, the argument will never work.