(March 29, 2013 at 6:05 am)FallentoReason Wrote:By now you've heard many possible explanations for Luke's wording. Would Luke have recorded a census if there wasn't one? That's like you claiming there was a president between Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon named Johnny Cool. Any fool could look it up and your story would lose credibility. Instead, history shows us that people believed Luke's account, as early as 60AD, which is why Christianity exploded in the way that it did.Undeceived Wrote:The Bible is prone to no errorCorrect. It is in fact the rest of the ancient world that decided to ignore a census that our Lord recorded in Luke's Gospel.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 30, 2024, 3:28 pm
Thread Rating:
For People Who Think There Was No Historical Jesus
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)